Re: Re: Git migration & revcheck tag

27 марта 2012 г. 8:05 пользователь Daniel Convissor <danielc@analysisandsolutions.com> написал: > Hola: > > On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 07:15:45PM -0500, Daniel Convissor wrote: >> Hi Folks: >> >> > > About Git migration : how are we deal with the revcheck tag ? >> > >> > I don't know much about it, but git supports keywords. You can have an >> > $Id$ field that is replaced by the sha1. >> >> I think the best we can do is a date keyword tag.  They're discussed at >> http://progit.org/book/ch7-2.html > > I'm following up on the email I sent earlier this month.  I didn't see > any responses.  Wondering what people think of the idea. I think it can work. We need to implement those filters in php (since it's the basic requirement of building docs anyway) and keep them in doc-base/, because as stated in ProGit link you posted, ".gitattributes are kept into repository but filters are not": > You can see how powerful this technique can be for customized applications. You have to be > careful, though, because the .gitattributes file is committed and passed around with the project but > the driver (in this case, dater) isn’t; so, it won’t work everywhere. When you design these > filters, they should be able to fail gracefully and have the project still work properly. Isn't $Date$ keyword is dependent from commiter's timezone? That would be a pain to maintain. Although we should be careful when replacing $Date: <some date here> back not to spoil any php code examples. -- Regards, Shein Alexey