Re: PEAR Documentation
| From: | Dave Mertens | Date: | Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:07:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR Documentation | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.evangelism |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-evangelism+get-71@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 09:27:30AM -0400, Sean Coates wrote:
> Regarding PHP Evangelism, I think there's a LOT of work to be done with
> PEAR, especially concerning documentation. (yes, I know there are PEAR
> lists, but this directly relates to evangelism).
>
> and coding standards. (link:
>
> http://www.sitepointforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=50331).
> Here's an
> excerpt that really got my attention:
Ok, to be honest, the PHP.net site is more referential than useful.
I think we should write some documentation (white papers, tutorials, etc)
about how thing can be done in PHP or with PEAR classes/packages.
I'm thinking about how to program a webservive in PHP, using SOAP and XML.
Using PEAR DB, caching, logging, etc.
> --
> (1 -Skunk)
> PEAR is developing into a superb resource and it's a great shame more PHP
> coders aren't aware of it - this is mainly thanks to the PEAR site being
> pretty rubbish (there's lots of information on PEAR but very little of it
> is available to the public via pear.php.net)
> (2 -Skunk (again))
Martin, stig and James are already convincing pear developers to write at
least docbook/phpdoc referential documentation.
But developers can't write user manuals. That's a fact, just like a
programmer can't test his own code..
> PEAR's greatest weakness in my opinion is pear.php.net - the documentation
> there is fine but it is very limited and gives a bad representation of what
> PEAR is. The fact that Renegade is hung up on the coding standard is a
> direct result of the PEAR website not being clear enough - instead of the
> coding standard being hidden away in an apendix somewhere where only PEAR
> developers will read it it is sat on the main website giving off the
> impression that it is the most important thing about PEAR.
I believe the pear website is currently maintained by 4 developers, who do
web developent as documentation.
I agree with the fact PHP needs more 'user' documentation. But who is
willing to write it?
The mailing lists are mainly used by active pear and php (the c-code)
programmers. PHP web developers aren't really using the mailinglists or
maybe some the php-general list.
--
With best regards,
Dave Mertens, Development Manager
dmertens@ism.nl
Innovative Solutions in Media BV
Schiekade 101
3033 BG Rotterdam, Netherlands
Tel. +31-10-2436060
Fax. +31-10-2436066