Re: [GD-DEVEL] 2.1.0 final

http://jessevdk.github.io/cldoc/ looks nice and very similar to cxref, small but functional. On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > hi! > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal > <chris.barker@noaa.gov> wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> On Friday 21 June 2013 17:33:03 Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote: >>>> It would be nice to have the docs in with the source -- I've only been >>>> able to find an old copy on boutell.com >>> >>> which docs ? the gd repo atm doesn't really contain any at all. >> >> exactly. >> >>> do you mean >>> the index.html that's in the 2.0.35 tarball ? >> >> If that's more or less what I find here: >> >> http://www.boutell.com/gd/manual2.0.33.html >> >> then yes. >> >> They could use some cleaning up, but they ar pretty useful none the less. > > Having updated documentation is the next top priority. The open > question is about the tool we could use. > > I really don't want to use doxygen, had suffered too much with it on > other projects ;-). I've played with CxRef > (http://www.gedanken.demon.co.uk/cxref/) and was quite happy with it. > However it does not seem to be actively maintained anymore. > > Docurium (https://github.com/libgit2/docurium) looks really nice and > works well with git. > > Any other alternatives or suggestions? I can imagine having gd 2.1.1 > with full documentations available if we can agree on which tool to > use :) > > Contributors and helpers welcome! > > Cheers, > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org