Re: [GD-DEVEL] Re: website details

MD + Jekyl is one step less than RST+Pelican. But you still need to manage the source in a repo. But I say whoever wants to maintain it can choose their tools. -CHB > On Mar 29, 2016, at 3:37 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi > > We discussed it when we did the new site. Back then it was not possible to > do it. I have to check why :) > > I am for MD anyway :) >> On Mar 29, 2016 5:35 PM, "Ondřej Surý" <ondrej@sury.org> wrote: >> >> Mike, feel free to rewrite it to MD. It was done for bitbucket. >> >> O. >> >> -- >> Ondřej Surý >>> On 29 Mar 2016, at 07:05, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> >>> can someone outline how the website comes together ? >>> it seems like the "source" is here: >>> https://github.com/libgd/website >>> which uses RST & Pelican to produce HTML which is checked in here: >>> https://github.com/libgd/libgd.github.io >>> >>> is that correct ? if so, is there a reason to keep it this way ? >>> if we're committed to github, then we can just write the content >>> in markdown directly and let github render it for us. then we can >>> drop the website repo and keep all the content in libgd.github.io. >>> >>> on a related note, what's up with http://lib.gd/ ? >>> seems to be dead. >>> >>> on another related note, how about changing the bitbucket site to >>> redirect to the new one ? otherwise, keeping it as-is makes it look >>> like it's still relevant. >>> http://libgd.bitbucket.org/ >>> >>> i don't have admin access to the libgd org or the repos, so can >>> someone who does turn off the wiki's for the website repos ? just >>> go to these pages and uncheck Wikis: >>> https://github.com/libgd/website/settings >>> https://github.com/libgd/libgd.github.io/settings >>> -mike >>> >>>