Re: 'Pure' php vs 'mixed' (html + php)
| From: | Michael Davey | Date: | Mon, 03 Jun 2002 02:15:19 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: 'Pure' php vs 'mixed' (html + php) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-100358@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> Point well-made. I suppose doing it the mixed way might have repercussions
> later on if/when the site grows. Perhaps while the code is still fresh in
my
> mid, it might be worth the effort to separate it.
>
> However, for a good part of the site, I've used CSS for appearance
details,
> and controlling a lot of stuff that changes from page-to-page. It's very
easy
> to change all or some of the pages from the CSS scripts. But, for the most
> part, not much of the actual php scripts COULD change, so that's why I've
> never bothered to separate html from php. Perhaps I wrong, but . . .
I think it is a case of horses for courses - you are working on what sounds
like a fairly small project, and "templatizing" your code may be more
trouble than it is worth, so whatever feels best for you...