RE: [PHP] Page Generation Time (your thoughts?)

From: Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 19:04:02 +0000
Subject: RE: [PHP] Page Generation Time (your thoughts?)
References: 1  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-10753@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Basically, there are two remarks: - you shouldn't output text after </HTML> - you should think about what you get while your script starts at, let's say, (n).99 and ends at (n+1):01. You end up with -0.98 which is not what you want. Better use getmicrotime() function from http://www.php.net/manual/function.microtime.php comment Maciek > -----Original Message----- > From: Cosenza, Mario [mailto:mcosenza@engsvcs.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 8:14 PM > To: php-general@lists.php.net > Subject: [PHP] Page Generation Time (your thoughts?) > > > Is microtime() the best way to calculate the page generation time? > > Considering there are a lot of DB calls, included files, etc. I was > wondering how long it took to build the page. > > I (basically) did the following... > > > $start=explode(" ", microtime()); > <HTML> > ...a bunch of DB calls & PHP code & HTML code... > </HTML> > $finish=explode(" ", microtime()); > echo "Page Generated in" . $finish[0]-$start[0] . "seconds"; > > > Is this the best (most accurate) way to do this? > > All the DB calls, includes, etc. should be completed by the end > of the page, > right? > > Thanks, > Mario > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help@lists.php.net > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net > >

« previous php.general (#10753) next »