Re: Sorting db entries by Year-Month
| From: | Andre Dubuc | Date: | Wed, 24 Jul 2002 04:19:35 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Sorting db entries by Year-Month | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-109243@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Simply wonderful news:>
But again, for design work, it isn't worth the trouble. I'm using SESSION
variables $_POST, $_SESSION, and as long as they don't change, there's
little point upgrading until the site is on-line. However, I will inform my
IP to use all the latest versions.
I'm running Linux-Mandrake 8.2 and the distro's Apache, PHP, and PostgeSQL.
I've rolled my own, but the distro's added features persuaded to use them.
When the site is finished, I will 'roll-my-own' and upgrade. Unfortunately,
PostgreSQL and PHP tend to like spreding themselves all over my hardrive. It
took me quite a bit of time to get my first versions working together.
So, as long as they haven't changed the functions, the vulnerablities are a
moot point at this time. Good to be aware of them, however.
Thanks for your concern.
Regards,
Andre
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 10:42 pm, you wrote:
> Yeah. Apache is vulneralbe to a buffer overflow in the chunked-encoding,
> and PHP has (i think) a buffer overflow in the multipart/form-data POST
> form handling. It might be a format string though... that just came out
> this week. yesterday, i think.
>
> For dev you might want to consider using the CVS version- that's what I do.
> And if you set up a script for the cron-tab or something you could get the
> latest version overnight... Unfortunatly, Apache CVS is not open to the
> public.
>
> On Tuesday 23 July 2002 17:58 pm, you wrote:
> > Well, that would be nice! Sort of 'completes-my-day' :>
> > So, both are vulnerable, eh? Great.
> >
> > Thanks for the warning -- but I'm using them for design only. Once the
> > site is on-line, I'll be sure to use the upgraded versions. From what I
> > read on-list, however, the current 'upgrades' have their problems too.
> > Luckily, I'll be on-line later in the fall, so enough time might pass for
> > the new PHP to stabilize.
> >
> > Regards, Andre
> >
> > On Tuesday 23 July 2002 08:47 pm, you wrote:
> > > What do you guys think? Should we tell him he's running a vulnerable
> > > version of PHP _and_ of Apache???
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 23 July 2002 16:26 pm, Andre Dubuc wrote:
> > > > Apache 1.3.23 + PHP 4.1.2 + PostgreSQl 7.2
> >
> > <snipped>