failure notice (fwd)

Is this for real? Rackspace hosts an awful lot of good-hearted people (including myself). Is there a specific reason why the entire ISP's customer base has been blocked from posting to php-general? I guess I have to give up participating on the PHP list... miguel ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: 27 Jul 2002 19:21:15 -0000 From: MAILER-DAEMON@stoic.net To: mnc@stoic.net Subject: failure notice Hi. This is the qmail-send program at stoic.net. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <php-general@lists.php.net>: 216.92.131.4 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 553 209.61.128.0/18 blocked by rackspace.blackholes.us Giving up on 216.92.131.4. --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: <mnc@stoic.net> Received: (qmail 22694 invoked by uid 508); 27 Jul 2002 19:21:11 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Jul 2002 19:21:11 -0000 Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 14:21:11 -0500 (CDT) From: Miguel Cruz <mnc@stoic.net> To: Tony Harrison <tonyh21@tharrison21.fsnet.co.uk> cc: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: Date() Problem In-Reply-To: <20020727120609.75001.qmail@pb1.pair.com> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207271420220.22623-100000@stoic.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Tony Harrison wrote: > I tried using UNIX stamps but it dont work, and why the hell does it default > to that date anyway? I thought it was supposed to default to the current > time? Be very happy it works the way it does. Since it defaults to an easily-recognizable date and time, you can quickly tell when you've messed up your code. If you don't provide a second argument to date() at all, then it'll default to the current date and time. miguel