Re: where's waldo

Well, I didn't really mean to imply anything about people's honesty and so forth... I just wanted to say that validating (anything) on the client side is not normally a good (and reliable) idea. Of course, as always mentioned, validation on the server side is always better. - E "Kenneth Love" <kennethlove@onewingedangel.com> wrote in message news:20020925223838.46117.qmail@pb1.pair.com... > about the peeking at the code... > yes, you could, unless the images were coded somehow. perhaps just numbers, > not names. after a few tries they'd find "waldo" easily enough, but not at > first. > > and besides. i'd like to give people credit for being more honest than that. > > > "@ Edwin" <copperwalls@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:OE20NyFSXOktnHNHbHv0000325c@hotmail.com... > > True. Perhaps. > > > > But, I think, you can actually do something like that WITH php. Say > > PHP+Flash or PHP+Javascript... > > > > Of course, if you're able to do something like this just by using > > PHP+Javascript (and HTML only), most probably, you can just take a peek at > > the code and find out where "waldo" is... ;) > > > > - E > > > > On Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:12 AM > > Marek Kilimajer wrote: > > > > > This is for java, javascript, or flash, not much to do for php. > > > > > > Kenneth Love wrote: > > > > > > >hi all. > > > > > > > >i'm interested in creating a php game that generates a page of random > > (ish) > > > >images, one of which is waldo (or the like). when the player clicks on > > > >waldo, they're taken to the next, slightly harder level. > > > > > > > >anyone think that sounds fun? > > > >any pointers, tips, advice, criticisms? > > > > > > > >-- > > > >->-> http://kennethlove.onewingedangel.com > > > ><-<- > > > > > > > > > >