Re: Convince teh boss
| From: | Evan Nemerson | Date: | Thu, 07 Nov 2002 16:59:52 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Convince teh boss | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-123187@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The reason pgsql is not mentioned is that the document began as me trying to
convince my boss to use LAMP (P==PHP, not PostgreSQL). I only posted when I
realized how much time I had spent on the thing.
I have decided to create a list that I'll post to my web site, and keep
current. That can have postgre as long as people are willing to help maintain
it (same goes for mysql, php, apache, and linux). Hell I can just create a
little PHP script and have an administrator for each component. If someone
really wants, they can do ASP, JSP, Perl, Python, whatever... eMail me if
interested.
That aside, my understanding is that MySQL recently added support for
transactions + stored procedures... Am I wrong? Has this been applied to the
stable branch, or just dev?
On Thursday 07 November 2002 06:14 am, Michael Sims wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Nov 2002 10:45:18 +0100, you wrote:
> >BTW, is there any reason why PostgreSQL is not mentioned here? While it
> >seems there are far more MySQL installations, I personally value
> > PostgreSQL higher... it's OpenSource as well, it's an OO database (you
> > may inherit, have object identifiers, etc), and it doesn't suffer from
> > MySQL's self-admitted limitations, mainly the lack of stored procedures
> > and triggers.
>
> I agree, I'm a big fan of PostgreSQL as well. I started using MySQL
> with PHP, but now I have used PostgreSQL for three seperate production
> databases and I find it just as easy to use as MySQL, and much more
> flexible. I think the general feeling among PHP developers
> (especially beginners) is that MySQL is easier to work with, but I
> personally don't understand that. I think the command line 'psql' is
> just as easy as the command line 'mysql', and when I need a GUI I
> think pgAdmin II fills in nicely. And you get foreign keys, triggers,
> stored procedures, sub-selects, unions, etc. etc. etc.
>
> Sorry, just had to send a "me too" response... :)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9ypwe/rncFku1MdIRAoDwAKCwDWq1rfRHfle1OJohYQh/OrBSBwCcDfYI
0R12PKUrWvDY4mGINe4+GL4=
=ErJF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----