Re: Dynamic vs. Static

From: Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 23:53:13 +0000
Subject: Re: Dynamic vs. Static
References: 1 2  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-127577@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
If you do it correctly, yes. The apache module usually lives somewhere in the apache hierarchy, whereas the 'php' binary is '/usr/bin/' or '/usr/local/bin/', so they can quite happily co-exist. Beware though, when upgrading one, upgrade BOTH. It drove me nuts once when i forgot, and ended up having a more recent command line version than apache module and couldn't figure out why cmdline scripts were acting differently than when served up thru apache. -- Scott Hurring Systems Programmer EAC Corporation scott (*) eac.com -- <ed@home.homes2see.com> wrote in message news:Pine.LNX.4.04.10212091530330.28871-100000@home.homes2see.com... > > Can I do that using the same src I used to create the dynamic module and > both would work hapilly together? > > Thanks, > > Ed > > > On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, John Nichel wrote: > > > No. To get the binary executable, compile it without the apache switch. > > > > ed@home.homes2see.com wrote: > > > When you compile php for apache using the dynamic module example used in > > > the documentation, do you not get an exacutable php to use from the > > > command line? > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > By-Tor.com > > It's all about the Rush > > http://www.by-tor.com > > >

« previous php.general (#127577) next »