Re: include/require vs performance
| From: | R . Z . | Date: | Fri, 03 Jan 2003 22:40:52 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: include/require vs performance | ||
| Groups: | php.general | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-130162@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Sorry if this was not 100% clear. In a nutshell the app I'm making will
be available for poeple to use. My feeling is that there will be users
using shared servers, which under a stress tend to suck. The only thing
in this one I'm doing that;s new to me is having some 20 includes loaded
as I need them, sometimes up to 10 at a time, hence the concern.
Thanks for all your responses, I got enough info to go on. ANother words,
this should not be a problem.
R>
http://sourceforge.net/projects/athena-research
>> Is there, was there ever issue around including a lot files via
>> include(). I am running things on a local server so it's hard to gauge.
>
>I don't understand that comment. includes/requires are always (well
>nearly anyway) local to the server regardless of where the request is
>coming from. So if you have a test box and it is fast enough for you,
>then go with it.
>
>-Rasmus
>
>--
>PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
>To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
___________________________________
Radoslaw Zajkowski
http://www.finalbanana.com