Re: Mysql/php database performance question
| From: | Maxim Maletsky | Date: | Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:49:36 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Mysql/php database performance question | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-131121@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
"keeping those 5 columns with a lot of empty cells in the last columns"
is better as it is means exactly for that. Just don't make it a not null
field.
--
Maxim Maletsky
maxim@php.net
"Khalid El-Kary" <khalid_kary@hotmail.com> wrote... :
> the thing that may make difference in performance (as i think) is whether
> you make it a fixed -CHAR- or a variable -VARCHAR- it's preferable that you
> make separate char columns, so that PHP will not have to explode every
> record!
>
> Regards,
> Khalid Al-Kary,
>
>
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >I got a question about using Mysql databases.
> >I load textdata in VARCHAR colums up to size 50. I have about 5 of those
> >columns.
> >The last columns often contain empty cells. (data are wordmeanings, many
> >words have only a 1 or 2meanings)
> >
> >What would be faster/better:
> >- putting everything in a big varchar column (size 5x50) and PHP parsing
> >them by comma after
> > fetching
> >
> > or
> >
> >- keeping those 5 columns with a lot of empty cells in the last columns?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Simon
> >
> >
> >--
> >PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> >To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> The new MSN 8 is here: Try it free* for 2 months
> http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup
>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>