SMTP, mail() and piping directly into Sendmail, which is better?

From: Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 03:48:55 +0000
Subject: SMTP, mail() and piping directly into Sendmail, which is better?
Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-132733@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I'm working on mass mailing list application and doing my research on the part with the actual delivery of the message. I've been using a Perl script called MojoMail which sends out blasts just fine and boasts that SMTP is the fastest way for delivery than with Sendmail using a module called BulkMail. I always understood that SMTP adds an additional layer around the MTA which really slows things down, however only useful if you plan to blast emails across several SMTP servers for a load balancing purposes. So that's a 'pro' for using SMTP. The 'con' is that delivery is not quite as fast. Then with PHP's mail(), folks have been saying that because it opens/closes a connection, looping through mail() adds additional overhead and that the best way would be to pipe into the MTA with popen()/pclose() Now I'm curious which method is really better...Piping into the MTA will still open/close the connection and adds the same amount of overhead as mail() do right? What are your thoughts on SMTP?

« previous php.general (#132733) next »