Re: smarty vs. patTemplate vs. includes - newbie q
| From: | neko | Date: | Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:55:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: smarty vs. patTemplate vs. includes - newbie q | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-136364@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
A great article on PHP and template engines can be found here:
http://phppatterns.com/index.php/article/articleview/4/1/1/
The opinon of the author is that template engines might not be worth your
time, and I'm inclined to agree. I'd rather develop a more comprehensive CMF
which limits what the user can design in other ways, rather than use some
template engine like smarty or velocity. To me, templates just seem like a
dumbed-down language - not that useful in my opinion.
neko