Re: smarty vs. patTemplate vs. includes - newbie q

From: Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:55:23 +0000
Subject: Re: smarty vs. patTemplate vs. includes - newbie q
References: 1 2  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-136364@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
A great article on PHP and template engines can be found here: http://phppatterns.com/index.php/article/articleview/4/1/1/ The opinon of the author is that template engines might not be worth your time, and I'm inclined to agree. I'd rather develop a more comprehensive CMF which limits what the user can design in other ways, rather than use some template engine like smarty or velocity. To me, templates just seem like a dumbed-down language - not that useful in my opinion. neko

« previous php.general (#136364) next »