Re: PHP vs. CGI
| From: | David T-G | Date: | Wed, 05 Mar 2003 22:20:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP vs. CGI | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-138375@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Mike --
..and then SpyProductions Support Team said...
%
% Does PHP use less system resources than CGI on a server?
Now that we know that by 'CGI' you mean 'perl' we're at least getting
*somewhere*. We don't really know what you mean, though, so I''ll see if
I can fill out the truth table for you.
In general, a mod_* version will be faster and lighter than a CGI version
(yes, you can have PHP as a CGI as well). In general, php and perl are
about on the same footing; both can be heavyweights but certainly don't
have to be.
perl php
+--------------+--------------+
| approx | approx |
| some amount | some amount |
mod | of resources | of resources |
| X | Y |
+--------------+--------------+
| something | something |
| more | more |
CGI | than | than |
| X | Y |
+--------------+--------------+
You'll probably find that X and Y are about the same. Your choice of
column doesn't matter one way or another. Which row you use is the
kicker.
%
% I have a bulletin board which is incredibly active, but there is a PHP
% sister to it.
The real question becomes "how are you running the perl version and,
figuring that's as a CGI, would you rather switch languages or just
modules?".
%
% Thanks,
%
% -Mike
HTH & HAND
:-D
--
David T-G * There is too much animal courage in
(play) davidtg@justpickone.org * society and not sufficient moral courage.
(work) davidtgwork@justpickone.org -- Mary Baker Eddy, "Science and Health"
http://justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur
Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!