RE: [PHP] Re: fasttemplate vs. smarty
| From: | Dan Rossi | Date: | Tue, 08 Apr 2003 05:42:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP] Re: fasttemplate vs. smarty | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-142798@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
i'd suggest check out this one
http://pukomuko.esu.lt/phemplate/tutorial/tutorial.html
its the only one which is non dirty templating and i could get my hed around
-----Original Message-----
From: John Coggeshall [mailto:john@coggeshall.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 12:08 AM
To: 'rush'; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: fasttemplate vs. smarty
Smarty is most definitely faster.
John
-~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~-
John Coggeshall
john at coggeshall dot org http://www.coggeshall.org/
-~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~-
>-----Original Message-----
>From: rush [mailto:pipa@rush.avalon.hr]
>Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 9:57 AM
>To: php-general@lists.php.net
>Subject: [PHP] Re: fasttemplate vs. smarty
>
>
>"Gilberto Garcia Jr." <garcia@ensino.net> wrote in message
>news:DEEHLCLOALOCMGNNCKGHAEHHDJAA.garcia@ensino.net...
>> Which class is faster: smarty or fasttemplate?
>
>I think Smarty is faster, but the two are also quite different
>(also I guess speed is only one of the factors to consider if at all)
>
>rush
>--
>http://www.templatetamer.com/
>
>
>
>
>--
>PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
>To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php