Re: Weird browser bug (I think)
| From: | Brian V Bonini | Date: | Fri, 16 May 2003 21:47:54 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Weird browser bug (I think) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-147981@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Well, first off, dude, it was a joke, perhaps you missed the ";-)" so
relax.
Second, if you take a look at the email header again I sent this
privately to you. Why you decided to make it public again by sending it
to the entire list is beyond me...
On Fri, 2003-05-16 at 14:23, Kevin Stone wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian V Bonini" <b-bonini@cox.net>
> To: "Kevin Stone" <kevin@helpelf.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 11:48 AM
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Weird browser bug (I think)
>
>
> > On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 13:48, Kevin Stone wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Brian V Bonini" <b-bonini@cox.net>
> > > To: "PHP Lists" <php-general@lists.php.net>
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 10:57 AM
> > > Subject: [PHP] Weird browser bug (I think)
> > >
> > >
> > > > I have this
> > > ..shnip..
> > > > Select Calories (number of cals replaced per hour):
> > > > <select name="r_calories">
> > > > <option value="250">250</option>
> > > > <option value="500"
> > > > selected="selected">500</option>
> > > > <option value="750">750</option>
> > > > <option value="1000">1000</option>
> > > > </select>
> > > >
> > > > However, when this is displayed by the browser (Mozilla) it
> > > > defaults to 1000 BUT if I take this same snippet of HTML and
> > > > paste it into the page so it's NOT created dynamically it's
> > > > fine and defaults to 500. Only when it's created via PHP does it
> > > > default to 1000. Only seems to effect Mozilla only, IE and Opera
> > > > are ok with it. Heck, even Lynx is ok with it.
> > > >
> > > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > The proper HTML syntax looks like this..
> > > <option value="" SELECTED></option>
> > >
> >
> > Time to brush up on your xhtml.. ;-)
>
> The reply to the individual's query was perfectly valid based on common
> knowledge. That said I think there's been enough noise on this topic.
> Please drop it.
>
> - Kevin