Re: Friendly URLs

This is a good reason to use such stuff. I see your point for this problem. Catalin "Rolf Brusletto" <rolf-list@triculture.com> wrote in message news:3ECE806B.6070309@triculture.com... > Catalin - > > I've used friendly urls on www.phpexamples.net because some search > engines don't dig pages with dynamic links(usually anything with a "?" > or "&"). I've had a few other sites that wouldn't get indexed, because > they are all dynamic, once I setup friendly urls on them, they got > indexed rather quickly :) > > Rolf Brusletto > http://www.phpexamples.net > > Catalin Trifu wrote: > > >*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* > > Hi, > > > > I know this may not be the place to discuss this, but > >we are all involved in HTML, wether we like it or not. > > My question is, where is the fuss with all this friendliness > >of URLs. I mean, why is > > > > http://mysite.mydom.dom/index.php?id=1&c=asaadas&dadsd=abc > > uglier than any other beautification, like: > > http://mysite.mydom.dom/index/id/1/c/asaadas/ etc. > > or any other "beauty" scheme. > > I, for one, think this is a bunch of crap and a useless effort. > > If any of you guys out there have any thoughts on this, please > >bear with me and let's talk about it. > > > >Catalin. > > > > > > > > > > >