Re: How To Ask Questions - Some List Guidelines
| From: | Kevin Stone | Date: | Mon, 14 Jul 2003 21:28:48 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: How To Ask Questions - Some List Guidelines | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-155183@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
"Chris Shiflett" <shiflett@php.net> wrote in message
news:20030714203756.60494.qmail@web14309.mail.yahoo.com...
> --- Burhan Khalid <phplist@meidomus.com> wrote:
> > Next thing, please add a reply-to header that has the lists mailing
> > address.
>
> This is a topic of debate, and many people (including myself) would urge
people
> to ignore this advice. Mangling mail headers can have bad consequences,
and
> there is very little reason to do so. If people want to reply to the
sender,
> they can. If they want to reply to all, they can do that, too. Intelligent
mail
> clients even allow you to reply to list.
>
> Mangling the Reply-To header just screws all of this up. It's as annoying
as
> those phone number form fields that automatically tab over.
>
> Chris
>
> =====
> Become a better Web developer with the HTTP Developer's Handbook
> http://httphandbook.org/
You make an interesting point however the problem is people reply to this
list using Email, Newsgroup and Web-based clients. The clients don't all
put the same information in their headers and they don't all understand the
same headers. If it were strictly a newsgroup list or strictly an email
list or strictly a web-based list then Yes you would have a valid point.
But if the list is to remain open to these different portals then you are
going to have to live with the occasional broken thread.
Case in point... => ME <=... I only recently moved from an Email client to a
Newsgroup client to view this list and I had no idea what-so-ever that any
of my replies were breaking threads. It was a real eye opener. :-)
- Kevin