Re: classes v. functions

From: Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 01:14:31 +0000
Subject: Re: classes v. functions
References: 1 2  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-156775@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> Hi, > > am Wednesday 23 July 2003 11:48 schrieb Joel Rees: > > > (You know that $accesses->count and $accesses->resetCounter() are at > > least declared in the same class declaration. $accesses_count and > > accesses_resetCounter() could be declared in entirely unrelated include > > files for entirely different purposes.) > > That is the only benefit. But it's not OOP. If you need namespaces and can't > take care of them w/o misuse of a semi-OOP construct youre not any more > efficient with it. ???? misuse? (I leaned sideways and cross my eyes, then I stood on my head, but that still makes no sense.) > >> Is there any performance benefit one way or the other? > > > > Programmer performance? > > > >> I used EZ_Sql which is cool but didn't seem to speed things up in > >> comparison to the said include file. > >> Still don't see the beef. > > > > Execution speed isn't all that matters. In fact, speed is not the point > > at all. > > Then you must be an PHPNuke or Typo3-programmer, beeing lucky to get at > least 1 request per second ;). Oh, yeah, gotta watch those bees. > Don't take it hard, but If you had ever been in computer-science > [school|college|...] you would know that speed is all that matters. Sure. ROFDDCI -- Joel Rees, programmer, Kansai Systems Group Altech Corporation (Alpsgiken), Osaka, Japan http://www.alpsgiken.co.jp Rate that troll, maybe a 4/10?

« previous php.general (#156775) next »