Re: PHP vs CGI ???
| From: | Scott Fletcher | Date: | Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:16:52 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP vs CGI ??? | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-163135@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Looked through all of those 11 README files and they don't say much about
it.
"Donald Tyler" <dtyler@frazerbilt.com> wrote in message
news:004c01c37eb3$2f895140$1300000a@ChekoteTablet...
> PHP can be installed as either a CGI or an Apache module. There is
> documentation on this in the PHP readme files.
>
> Pretty much everything I read said that its always better to use the
> Apache Module version. (apparently its much more stable and secure)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Fletcher [mailto:scott@abcoa.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 8:38 AM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] PHP vs CGI ???
>
> Hi!
>
> I have a question. Someone said that PHP is CGI, that kind of
> turned my
> head because PHP is not like that. But I can see one thing, PHP can be
> compiled as either a 'Shell-Scripting-Language', 'Webserver Component'
> or
> 'Both'... PHP would be a form of CGI if it is used as Shell Scripting
> Language but if I compile Apache and have it create a PHP module then it
> is
> not a form of CGI.
>
> Can anyone point this out or clarify this? It would be very much be
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Scott F.
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
>