RE: [PHP] Singleton Was: [PHP] OO parent/child relationship

From: Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:52:20 +0000
Subject: RE: [PHP] Singleton Was: [PHP] OO parent/child relationship
References: 1  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-165340@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
One quick thought: You might want to add the following to your if statement: else { $this->_cache[$key] = new $key; return $this->_cache[$key]; } Andy > -----Original Message----- > From: Gerard Samuel [mailto:gsam@trini0.org] > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 5:36 PM > To: 'PHP List' > Subject: [PHP] Singleton Was: [PHP] OO parent/child relationship > > Gerard Samuel wrote: > > > Andy Crain wrote: > > > >> This all seems like a perfect case for the singleton pattern. See > >> > >> http://www.phppatterns.com/index.php/article/articleview/6/1/1/ and > >> > >> http://www.phppatterns.com/index.php/article/articleview/75/1/1/ > >> Andy > >> > > Im currently trying to wrap the brain around the Singleton Registry > > article. > > Wish me luck :) > > http://www.trini0.org/index.php > This is based on work seen at > > http://www.phppatterns.com/index.php/article/articleview/75/1/1/ > Yes yes, I know. It uses $GLOBALS, (OO Sin). Father forgive me.... > From the article, Im getting lost with the reason/meaning/purpose of > the instance() method. > If anyone can clarify it for me, and let me know if my example would > need something like it. > So if you care to critique it, feel free, Ill try not to be hurt ;) > Thanks > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

« previous php.general (#165340) next »