Re: header() refresh vs location
| From: | Matt Babineau | Date: | Tue, 14 Oct 2003 16:19:18 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: header() refresh vs location | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-166106@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
In this example, index.php would be a violation i think. however you
don't need to provide an absolute URL, you could provide / or ever
/index.php
I say this because the header specifying the Host had already been sent.
so you could do Location: Host + Relative_URL or Location: Relative_URL
since the browser already knows what Host you are connected to.
I could be totally wrong, just my experience in the path month or so.
Cheers!
Matt
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 15:08, Chris Shiflett wrote:
> --- Chris Hubbard <chris@wildcharacters.com> wrote:
> > header('Location: index.php');
>
> The Location header requires an absolute URL. This example demonstrates a
> violation of the specification and can have unknown results.
>
> Chris
>
> =====
> My Blog
> http://shiflett.org/
> HTTP Developer's Handbook
> http://httphandbook.org/
> RAMP Training Courses
> http://www.nyphp.org/ramp