Re: w3c-compliant form-action parameters
| From: | Timo Boettcher | Date: | Sun, 26 Oct 2003 12:51:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: w3c-compliant form-action parameters | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-167620@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Chris,
Nachricht vom Samstag, 25. Oktober 2003, 19:06:10:
> --- Timo Boettcher <spida@gmx.net> wrote:
>> > http://shiflett.org/dev/php-general/ampersand.php
>>
>> can you put the source of that online, too?
> You can view the source in your browser to see the HTML, which is
> the relevant part.
I know that, but I wanted to see if you PHP-source gets the same
results on my server (testing if my server is misconfigured)
> If you see the HTML entity for an ampersand in your browser's
> location bar after submitting the form, then your browser has a bug.
> If you only see a plain ampersand, your browser is fine, and your
> code has a bug.
I guess its the latter... *g*
>> I get the same result as you do.
>> BUT: that page doesn't validate.... *g*
> Look again. Mine is not a full page, obviously, in order to focus
> your attention to the relevant markup.
Having the php-source of that part would make it easier to build a
full page out of it, to put it through the W3C Validator.
> What is there is XHTML-compliant.
> I'm not sure what "validate" means to you, but your earlier
> complaint about an ampersand not validating leads me to believe you
> were validating against XHTML transitional or strict.
> You can let us know which, if you want, but it is irrelevant to your
> immediate problem.
That was in the post you ansered with this one.
I am trying to get
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<HEAD>
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
> I am trying to not let you distract yourself; this is what makes
> solving problems more difficult for many people.
I am trying to get that page to work AND validate as in the W3C HTML
Validator. I was able to get both, but not at the same time, so that
is one problem, and splitting it in two doesn't help me to solve it.
> Chris
Timo