Re: _SESSION, _POST, and _GET
| From: | David T-G | Date: | Mon, 17 Nov 2003 03:59:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: _SESSION, _POST, and _GET | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-169886@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
John, et al --
..and then John W. Holmes said...
%
% David T-G wrote:
%
% >...and then John W. Holmes said...
% >%
% >% This whole question revolves around the reason you're even extract()ing
% >% anything to begin with... Why not just use the $_SESSION, $_POST, etc
% >% arrays where you need them. There's no reason to extract().
% >
% >OK; fair enough. 1) I was just shown it in a recent thread and it seemed
% >like a lifesaver :-) 2) I want to get our existing code rewritten to "be
% >good" and not lose stuff, like passwords and email addresses, that it's
% >supposed to remember -- as quickly as possible.
% >
% >I know they're famous last words, but I figure I'll do it right later :-)
% >[Hey, I'm even thinking of a full top-down rewrite anyway!]
%
% If you're going to extract blindly from $_POST and $_GET, you might as
% well just turn register_globals back on; that's what you've basically got.
Urgh. Yeah, I see your point.
%
% There's absolutely no reason to extract $_XXX['var'] so you can use $var
% instead of just using $_XXX['var'] wherever you need that value...
Yeah. In fact, about half an hour ago I figured that I was spending more
time figuring out how to extract in the right order -- or in a limited
way -- than I would just doing it right, so I started running through the
code looking for any $pw and friends to change :-)
So thanks for the prod; I'm sure it's for the best.
%
% --
% ---John Holmes...
HAND
:-D
--
David T-G * There is too much animal courage in
(play) davidtg@justpickone.org * society and not sufficient moral courage.
(work) davidtgwork@justpickone.org -- Mary Baker Eddy, "Science and Health"
http://justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur
Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!