Re: class limitations brought by PEAR

From: Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:03:23 +0000
Subject: Re: class limitations brought by PEAR
References: 1  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-174528@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
In article <4004DED1.7030502@GreenAppleStream.com>, Design@GreenAppleStream.com says... > I don't want to rely on PEAR, mainly because I don't know it too well to > use it fully. But most PHP installs come with base PEAR classes, so does > that take away my ability to name classes that PEAR already made? (ie. > class DB). > > Glenn > If the base PEAR install is not in your include_path, then it shouldn't be a problem. Cheers -- Quod subigo farinam A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet?

« previous php.general (#174528) next »