Re: Re[4]: [PHP] problems with spam

From: Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:20:10 +0000
Subject: Re: Re[4]: [PHP] problems with spam
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-178071@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
In article <20040217181105.10308.qmail@pb1.pair.com>, ng@xemoc.cjb.net says... > <1624732628.20040216160211@launchcode.co.uk> > Richard Davey: > > Hello mayo, > > > > Monday, February 16, 2004, 3:51:30 PM, you wrote: > > > > m> As for my email being harvested because I wrote it out > > m> (mayo@nycinteractive.com). Well I'll change it to > > m> something else. :-) > > > > There are other ways - spam bots can actually subscribe to the list > > and then just reap the email address of anyone who posts. Or of course > > just scan the web version of the list archives. > > > > m> As it is members of one listserv has gotten swamped. The response > > there was m> a deluge of "me too!" > > > > I bet. It's annoying, but not as annoying as when you post to the list > > and get a stack of Delivery Reports, Out of office replies, user > > mailbox full errors and various other things back again from the > > actual "subscribers". > > The only way to get rid of it would be to use the newsgroup version. > And never post.... -- Quod subigo farinam A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet?

« previous php.general (#178071) next »