RE: [PHP] What's the use in OOP?
| From: | Robert Cummings | Date: | Tue, 30 Mar 2004 00:25:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP] What's the use in OOP? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-181751@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 18:23, Chris Shiflett wrote:
> --- Kelly Hallman <khallman@ultrafancy.com> wrote:
> > I think there is a bit of what I consider an efficiency myth in
> > regards to OOP in PHP. Most agree that the OO implementation in PHP
> > is not robust.
>
> It's much better in PHP 5, although a lack of robustness is not how I
> would personally describe PHP 4's shortcomings.
>
> > However, most people that rely on this assertion do not usually
> > understand leveraging OO and also most do not write excellent non-OO
> > code. :)
>
> Perhaps, but I would say that most people who make this assertion
> understand OO. The performance penalty is not a myth. Just as templating
> incurs a performance penalty, so does OO. The reward can be worth it, of
> course, in terms of organization and ease of use.
I'd just like to point out as I often do, that the templating system's
implementation determines if there is a performance penalty :)
compiled-to-source templating systems don't incur such a run-time
performance hit, and can in fact increase performance due to the fact
the inclusion happens once at the compile stage. This would be akin to
inlined code :)
Cheers,
Rob.
--
.------------------------------------------------------------.
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com
|
:------------------------------------------------------------:
| An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting |
| a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services |
| such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn |
| also provides an extremely flexible architecture for |
| creating re-usable components quickly and easily. |
`------------------------------------------------------------'