Re: Re: TUX web server replacement
| From: | William Lovaton | Date: | Tue, 30 Mar 2004 22:55:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: TUX web server replacement | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-181875@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Manuel,
El mar, 30-03-2004 a las 17:38, Manuel Lemos escribió:
> Hello,
>
> On 03/30/2004 09:38 AM, William Lovaton wrote:
> > Well, I'am aware of that but the application is already made and it is
> > big and development continue, so change it will be a huge task and we
> > have no resources available for it.
> >
> > Tux used to perform very well here, but unfortunatelly there is no other
> > user space competitor that offers the same features. :-(
>
> Actually there is Apache 2. The problem is that some PHP extensions are
> not re-entrant and they do not run properly in multi-threading
> environments. It depends on which extensions you use.
I was thinking that may be I could configure the server to use Apache 2
(w/o PHP) with multi-thread just to serve static content and use
reverseproxy to pass dynamic requests to Apache 1.3/PHP
This might work... I gues that any web server to make advantage of the
new kernel 2.6 has to make explicit use of the sendfile() system call.
I know for sure that boa does it. I don't know about thttpd or apache2.
-William