Re: Quick file_get_contents() questions...your opinion needed

I did look at the fopen option...but it just seemed a little longer and more complicated to do that plus according to this benchmark (http://force-elite.com/~chip/projects/php/benchmarks/file-vs-fgets/) using file_get_contents is upto 6 times faster (?) in some cases.. I think I'll stick with this, and specify that anybody running this code should have php 4.3.x or higher Most webhosts too I think will have a 4.3 or above version...if they are a good host anyway, or....not? I mean I have been running php on my desktop for months and have 4.3.1.. Feel free to correct me :-) Cheers, Mag --- Greg Donald <destiney@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Mag > <genphp@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Interesting, so what is more backwards compatable? > or > > to put it in another way, what did you change on > your > > servers so that your app worked without > > file_get_contents? > > I used the usual fopen(), fgets(), fclose() > combination which has been > available since PHP3. > > > -- > Greg Donald > Zend Certified Engineer > http://gdconsultants.com/ > http://destiney.com/ > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > ===== ------ - The faulty interface lies between the chair and the keyboard. - Creativity is great, but plagiarism is faster! - Smile, everyone loves a moron. :-) _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com