Re: mailparse or imap* ?

Per Jessen wrote: > I need functions to parse an email and I've been using mailparse sofar. Works > pretty well, except it has a couple of shortcomings - will only retrieve last > of the Received:-headers, does not decode quoted-printable body-parts, does > not decode RFC2047-encoded filenames in COntent-Disposition. > So I've been having a closer at imap* - but it's just not very clear if imap* > will for instance deal with a single email available as a string? > mailparse does exactly what I need, except the shortcomings listed are > becoming a problem. > any suggestions? (other than fixing mailparse :-) No takers? What *do* you guys use for parsing an email then? I'd prefer to keep using mailparse, except it's not complete :-( /Per -- Per Jessen Let your spam stop here -- http://www.spamchek.dk