Re: Installing on Windows.... CGI v. ISAPI?

From: Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 18:07:42 +0000
Subject: Re: Installing on Windows.... CGI v. ISAPI?
Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-205314@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi, Though the ISAPI version is getting more stable it's still not as stable as the CGI version. As an alternative to CGI you can use FastCGI. It installs a module in the IIS web server and will preload a number of PHP processes. This will make the web requests perform almost as fast as the ISAPI version, but without the troubles. Read more here: http://www.caraveo.com/fastcgi/ - Frank > GH wrote: > > #2 which method is better to install PHP with IIS? ISAPI or CGI? > > ISAPI... no idea what it stands for though, but installing PHP that way > will make it a module within the server instead of an .exe file that's > loaded with each PHP request... > > -- > > ---John Holmes... > > Amazon Wishlist: www.amazon.com/o/registry/3BEXC84AB3A5E/ > > php|architect: The Magazine for PHP Professionals – www.phparch.com > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >

« previous php.general (#205314) next »