Re: Re: fopen
| From: | Richard Lynch | Date: | Tue, 22 Mar 2005 01:15:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: fopen | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-211237@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sat, March 19, 2005 6:48 am, John Taylor-Johnston said:
> chmod($defaultfile, 666);
http://php.net/chmod
has examples that tell you exactly why this is wrong...
666 is decimal.
The 666 you want is Octal.
They ain't the same number.
> What does the at_sign mean at the start of this line?
>
> @ $results = fopen($datafilename, "w+");
@ means you are IGNORING any errors this generates.
It's usually a really bad idea unless you have some more code for error
checking.
> if (!$results) { die ("Our results file could not be opened for writing.
> Your score was not recorded. Please contact the person responsible and
> try again later."); }
> flock($results, 2); #lock file for writing
> fwrite($results, $filestr); #write $filestr to $results
> flock($results, 3); #unlock file
> fclose($results); #close file
This is an incorrect way to try to flock a file for writing.
You should:
1) Open the file for READING.
2) flock that file handle, so only YOU have access to that file.
3) Re-open the file for WRITING, now that you have control.
4) Write your data
5) Release the lock.
Your application, as it stands now, has a race condition between the open
for writing and the flock, which sooner or later, WILL bite you in the
ass.
Probably.
Maybe.
If $filestr is small enough, the Linux OS has locking built-in. Windows
may or may not (and I don't care enough about Windows to remember, much
less look it up). FreeBSD and other OSes may or may not also have locking
at OS layer. I wouldn't rely on it, though, since it's trivial to do the
5 steps above.
--
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm