Re: Re: using rand()
| From: | Ryan A | Date: | Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:23:20 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: using rand() | ||
| Groups: | php.general | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-212647@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I guess so, but I dont think the difference would be all that great using
rand() in php or "order by rand" in mysql..
worth checking up for "programmer show off" rights anyway :-)
Cheers,
Ryan
> i guess a good question would be which one of these methods has more
>
> overhead - having php calculate the random numbers for queries, or
>
> having the mysql db pick them at random itself? i don't really focus
> that much on optimization, but if you expect heavy traffic on your
> site, it might be in your best interest to find out which one executes
> quicker.
>
>
> On Apr 8, 2005 9:41 AM, kyriacos sakkas <kyriacos@netsmart.com.cy> wrote:
> > first I would suggest you get the largest value from the auto increment
> > field (maybe use last_insert_id()). Then use rand(1,$cno_max) three
> > times to get three random cno numbers, then "select ... from ... where
> > cno=$val1 or cno=$val2 or cno=$val3" should return the three values.
> > rand() can also be directly in the sql statement.
> > Also manual suggests using mt_rand instead of rand for better
performance.
> >
> > K.Sakkas
> >
> >
> > Ryan A wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > > need some advise on what would be the best way to do this:
> > >
> > > I have a table with these fields:
> > > cno (just a auto_increment field),
> > > username,
> > > sex (2 values: man, woman),
> > > has_pic (0=no,1=yes),
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.5 - Release Date: 4/7/2005