Re: Re: Strange notation to create object
| From: | Robert Cummings | Date: | Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:06:48 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Strange notation to create object | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-217506@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 13:36, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
> * Robert Cummings <robert@interjinn.com> :
> > On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 11:32, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
> > > The above notation is unnecessary when developing in PHP5, as objects in
> > > PHP5 are passed by reference by default. However, in PHP4, this was
> >
> > Not entirely, there's still a subtle difference in PHP5 between
> > assigning an object with = versus assigning with = &.
>
> Would you mind explaining the difference? I've seen nothing in the docs,
> to indicate that assigning objects with =& in PHP5 is necessary, or even
> desired. My experience with PHP5 hasn't shown this either. I'd be
> interested to know to what you refer.
See for yourself when running the following script:
<?php
class a
{
}
class b
{
}
$aObj = new a();
$bObj = new b();
$foo1 = $aObj;
$foo2 = $aObj;
$foo3 = $foo1;
$foo4 = &$foo2;
echo "------------------\n";
print_r( $foo1 );
print_r( $foo2 );
print_r( $foo3 );
print_r( $foo4 );
$foo1 = $bObj;
$foo2 = $bObj;
echo "------------------\n";
print_r( $foo1 );
print_r( $foo2 );
print_r( $foo3 );
print_r( $foo4 );
$foo1 = &$aObj;
?>
Cheers,
Rob.
--
.------------------------------------------------------------.
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com
|
:------------------------------------------------------------:
| An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting |
| a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services |
| such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn |
| also provides an extremely flexible architecture for |
| creating re-usable components quickly and easily. |
`------------------------------------------------------------'