Re: Stop spreading PEAR FUD; WAS Re: [PHP] Re: PHP web archeticture
| From: | Chris Shiflett | Date: | Sat, 25 Jun 2005 15:24:05 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Stop spreading PEAR FUD; WAS Re: [PHP] Re: PHP web archeticture | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-217612@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
I also tend to stay away from PEAR, which is kinda bloated for my taste, except the Log package. <rant> I hear that a lot on this list, and I don't understand the reasoning behind such comments -- perhaps because nobody offers any reasoning, only the opinion?There is some justification, but as you correctly note, it's mostly based on what PEAR was a few years ago or because of some bad experience with a particular package (often both).
I'm a PEAR user, and I've found the packages anything *but* bloated.Part of the perception was that the PEAR base class was a bit bloated, and combined with the poor performance of OO in PHP 4, this did make a noticeable difference in many cases. Luckily, both aspects have been improved. :-) Chris -- Chris Shiflett Brain Bulb, The PHP Consultancy http://brainbulb.com/