Re: Abstract Classes?
| From: | GamblerZG | Date: | Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:16:30 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Abstract Classes? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-224592@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Oliver Grätz wrote:
GamblerZG schrieb:I did not say abstractness did not make sense. But it's not crucial. -- Best regards, Roman S.I. http://sf.net/projects/naturalgine/No, it's there because it makes sense.But what benefit is there is having it as an explicitly "abstract" class? Why can't it just be a "normal" class definition which you inherit from?The idea is that a high-level language should prohobit you from doing things that do not make sence. Why they implemented it in PHP? Because it's there in Java, I guess.