Re: Re: PhpMailer vs Pear:Mail
| From: | Max Schwanekamp | Date: | Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:59:55 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PhpMailer vs Pear:Mail | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-226610@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Richard Heyes wrote:
Petr Smith wrote:But but but, what *is* the advantage of one over the other? I've been a PhpMailer devotee for some time. PEAR::Mail is too spare, PhpMailer is reasonably quick and has proven quite stable (I've built a couple newsletter apps using it). What's the advantage of Richard's package vs. the Pear one (on which he is a lead dev) vs. PhpMailer? -- Max Schwanekamp http://www.neptunewebworks.com/I tried all and ended with http://www.phpguru.org/static/htmlMimeMail5.html fast, stable, usable.A very good choice. ;-)