RE: [PHP] PHP vs. ColdFusion
| From: | Curtis, Lorenzo | Date: | Wed, 01 Nov 2000 01:42:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP] PHP vs. ColdFusion | ||
| Groups: | php.general | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-23047@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I don't think they were dis'ing the technology or the language itself, only
the lack on consistency across the language.
PHP is my primary language (second only to English) and although the article
clearly favors CFML and JSP it did a fair job of explaining the pros and
cons of each language - the pros of PHP being the speed at which it can
display pages - vs. the ease of BASIC coding utilizing CFML.
Going by the information handed out by Ziff-Davis, I would use CFML for
template sites and PHP for custom sites.
That's my opinion, I welcome yours (grin)!
__________________________________
Lorenzo Curtis
Website/Database Developer
Prexar - Internet and Beyond
lorenzo.curtis@prexar.com
(207) 974-4334
-----Original Message-----
From: Samantha Savvakis [mailto:samantha@cfs.net.au]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 8:21 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP] php vs cold fusion
Did this whole topic of conversation come from this new article on ZDNet? I
missed the original thread.
http://www.zdnet.com/enterprise/stories/linux/0,12249,2646052,00.html
It pretty much bagged PHP in a sense. They say ColdFusion and JSP is the way
to go. The article seemed a little biased to me.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net
For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help@lists.php.net
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net