Re: Blogger post failed

From: Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:37:16 +0000
Subject: Re: Blogger post failed
References: 1  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-231847@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I have never been to blogger.com, let alone posted something to it. anyone have any idea what this is about? is google trying to assimilate me or something? postgateway@blogger.com wrote:
Blogger could not process your message at this time. Error code: 6.1C18D13 Original message: From: jochem@iamjochem.com Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:19:56 +0100 Subject: Re: [PHP] what would a c extension buy me joseph wrote:
sorry, i made a mistake before.
                 9795 Query       select
word,def,wordid,pos,posn,wordsize,syn from korean_english where word like 'ìš´ì „í• ' order by wordsize desc
in cases when you are not using the wildcard tokens (percentage signs) try changing the query to use something like: ... word = 'ìš´ì „í• ' ...
i have to stick with 'like' because it matches case-insensitive, else the first word of a sentence (with a capital letter) doesn't match the db word. FYI
do you really care about case (in languages where characters even have case)? if not stick everything into the DB as uppercase and test against that (always normalizing everything to uppercase before doing the queries). it would be faster than a case-insensitive search also consider it might be worth creating a special index for the first (couple?) of letters of the WORD field, that would allow something like this (not in all cases obviously): SELECT * FROM korean_english WHERE word = 'ìš´ì „í• ' AND SUBSTR(word,0,1) = 'ìš´' (now I'm allowed to sue 'SELECT * ...' because I'm offering a possible concept/idea - as opposed to pasting code for people look at) - basically the idea entails creating an index (possibly based on an extra column) that would allow the mysql engine to start searching in a smaller subset based on the 2nd (in this case) WHERE clause and using the more compact 'SUBSTR(word,0,1)' index. this might not have any effect whatsoever depending on how indexes are used internally by the mysql engine. so basically this is me guessing :-)


« previous php.general (#231847) next »