Re: here document

From: Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 05:42:14 +0000
Subject: Re: here document
References: 1 2  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-23323@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Dean Hall writes: > > anything like perl's > > print<<EOF > > blah blah blah > > EOF > > > > ? > > There's no need for here documentation in PHP. PHP is embedded in HTML, not > the other way around. To do something like that, you'd do: This is only true for simple scripts. For instance, I've got several thousand lines of backend code with no HTML *anywhere*. Despite the fact that PHP was originally designed to be easily embeddable in HTML, for extensive, modular, and maintainable code bases, it is not desirable to do so. > <? > // some PHP > ?> > blah blah blah > <? > some more PHP > ?> > > Dean. Well, it was added nearly a year ago for two reasons: 1) ease (subjective) of complex output, and 2) to get people to stop asking for it every 5 minutes. :) For instance, the following is IMHO a PITA to type in: ?> <table> <tr> <td><?php echo $name ?></td> <td><?php echo $email ?></td> </tr> </table> <?php Whereas this feels a lot easier: echo <<<EOT <table> <tr> <td>$name</td> <td>$email</td> </tr> </table> EOT; Plus, it allows to to assign the whole chunk to a variable, which you can't do with the ?><?php method. Sure, it's an overly simplified and contrived example. But it *can* be a useful function which extends beyond the mere status of syntactic sugar. YMMV. -- +----------------------------------------------------------------+ |Torben Wilson <torben@php.net> Netmill iTech| |http://www.coastnet.com/~torben http://www.netmill.fi| |Ph: 1 250 383-9735 torben@netmill.fi| +----------------------------------------------------------------+

« previous php.general (#23323) next »