Re: simpleXML - simplexml_load_file() timeout?
| From: | Richard Lynch | Date: | Tue, 11 Apr 2006 22:38:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: simpleXML - simplexml_load_file() timeout? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-233805@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, April 10, 2006 10:21 pm, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 23:11, Richard Lynch wrote:
>> On Mon, April 10, 2006 9:59 pm, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>> > Richard Lynch wrote:
>> I've added a Note to 'fopen' so maybe others won't completely miss
>> this feature and look as foolish as I do right now. :-)
>
> If it's anything like the helpful note I added about using copy(
> source,
> dest ) where dest accidentally points to source (due to linking),
> you'll
> get a nice retarded email like the following:
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> You are receiving this email because your note posted
> to the online PHP manual has been removed by one of the editors.
I also have had what I still believe were actually quite useful
comments deleted :-(
And none of the reasoning in the stock form email applied, imho.
It's an awfully long stretch or a very thin line between these:
"Feature Request: Documentation"
"User Contrbuted Note"
I mean, the BEST "User Contributed Notes" probably qualify as Feature
Requests to improve the Docs, no?
Seems like those are the ones getting nuked, sometimes.
Oh well.
[shrug]
Better than the alternative of having a lot of utter [bleep] in the
User Contributed sections, I guess.
Still, maybe an "appeal" or a reader-voting system would make more
sense than a PHP Dev/Doc Team member copy-editing every note...
Obviously you'd still want a Doc Team member stepping in at some point
and just nuking anything blatantly "wrong" no matter how popular...
--
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm