Re: PHP Standard style of writing your code
| From: | Rafael | Date: | Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:51:21 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP Standard style of writing your code | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-235096@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Thanks for your reply. Paul Novitski already "talked" with me about it (in private), and my conclusions were...
-----
I guess that has something to do with the way *I* read my mails, since I'm usually aware what people are talking about (since I've wrote the one they're responding, or I've been following the thread)
I think you have a pretty good reason, but I also think it doesn't work for me --since I have to skip the whole message I've already read, or what I wrote :) Thanks for your answer (and so fast)
-----
I guess this is just one more of the too-many-already debatible points out there. At the end, is a matter of taste, I can't see any as the right nor wrong option.
PS I'd ask you a favor: do not include the email in the quotation, since these message are usually available (via http) in some sites, and having my email there makes a lot easier for me to get (even) more spam
PPS WTF is "IMALOOPHO"?
Porpoise wrote:
"Rafael" <email-was-here> wrote in message news:41.D3.18514.A79F2544@pb1.pair.com... P.S. What, in your mind, is the advantage of replying after quoting the original message and not before? :) In an NG environment, it allows everyone to follow the logic and see clearly what is being replied to, in the correct context. IMALOOPHO... -- Atentamente, J. Rafael Salazar Magaña Innox - Innovación Inteligente Tel: +52 (33) 3615 5348 ext. 205 / 01 800 2-SOFTWARE http://www.innox.com.mx