Re: require_once and E_WARNING?
| From: | chris smith | Date: | Thu, 06 Jul 2006 11:17:24 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: require_once and E_WARNING? | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-239163@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 7/6/06, Martin Marques <martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar> wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, php@kermodebear.org wrote: Hello all, According to the PHP Manual, when require or require_once failes, an E_ERROR is triggered: "require() and include() are identical in every way except how they handle failure. include() produces a Warning while require() results in a Fatal Error." (With 'Fatal Error' being a link to E_ERROR). Thing is, when using a custom error handler via set_error_handler(), it appears to be triggering an E_WARNING, not an E_ERROR. Using PHP 5.1.4 under Linux. There are one of three possibilities: I am suffering from a lapse in lucidity (common), the manual is wrong (possible), or PHP is broken somehow (unlikely). I'm guessing it's the first, but what am I doing wrong? I'd like to get a second opinion before submitting a bug. I searched bugs.php.net but was unable to find anything relevant for 5.1.4. Code: function default_error_handler($code, $error, $file, $line) { switch ($code) { case E_ERROR:That will cause a parse error and the script won't even run. -- Postgresql & php tutorials http://www.designmagick.com/die ("Error: $error");case E_WARNING:die("Warning: $error");default:die("Something else entirely: $error");} } What happens if you put breaks after the die()? This shouldn't be necesary, but it wouldn't hurt to try. ;-) As I see in the example of the PHP manual, a break is put even after an exit(1) call. set_error_handler('default_error_handler'); require('This file does not exist. At least not here!'); Have you tried this handler with something more fatal, like a missing semi-colon or a } missmatch?