Re: Static Pages with PHP
| From: | Richard Lynch | Date: | Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:18:24 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Static Pages with PHP | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-244900@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun, November 19, 2006 11:41 pm, Paul Novitski wrote:
> a) You can redirect to the static page. It can have either an .html
> extension or a .php extension. If all it contains is HTML markup,
> that's what will be downloaded to the client.
>
> http://php.net/header
> header("Location: http://www.example.com/");
Rant #37:
This chews up an HTTP connect, adds significant network "lag" to the
client-server interaction, and ends up reading the static file you
could have just read in your original script.
It will "work" but is, imho, a needless waste of resources and more
confusing/complicated than a simple readfile()
> b) You can read the HTML markup from a separate file and echo it to
> the client. (e.g., file(), get_file_contents())
>
> http://php.net/file_get_contents
> echo file_get_contents('example.html');
This will read the file into RAM, then into a PHP string, then echo it
out. I *think* readfile() will, at least in later versions, be more
efficient. Not that it really matters for performance to most users,
but, still, readfile() is probably more clear to read.
--
Some people have a "gift" link here.
Know what I want?
I want you to buy a CD from some starving artist.
http://cdbaby.com/browse/from/lynch
Yeah, I get a buck. So?