Re: How php works?
| From: | Roman Neuhauser | Date: | Sun, 17 Dec 2006 14:41:08 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: How php works? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-245923@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
# robert@interjinn.com / 2006-12-16 09:52:18 -0500:
> On Sat, 2006-12-16 at 15:59 +0000, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > # robert@interjinn.com / 2006-12-16 07:24:49 -0500:
> > > On Sat, 2006-12-16 at 19:58 +0800, Kai Xiang wrote:
> > > > On 12/16/06, Richard Lynch <ceo@l-i-e.com> wrote:
> > > > > (*)
> > > > > Actually, if somebody wants to embed the ZE inside of something other
> > > > > than PHP, then I think Zend expects to get paid for that.
> > >
> > > I don't think so... the PHP and Zend licenses are quite liberal with
> > > very few restrictions. Namely that you don't call your software php or
> > > use php in the name (something many packages seem to ignore (either that
> > > or they got permission)). The Zend license is practically a clone of the
> > > PHP license with a search and replace for PHP to Zend :) There's nothing
> > > that says you have to pay to embed it in your own software. That said,
> > > if you make a product that uses either the PHP or Zend engine and makes
> > > oodles of money, I think you should feel somewhat morally obliged to
> > > give back in some way.
> >
> > Sorry if I take this OT, but when I publish my work under the MIT license,
> > I mean it. Anything else would be hypocrisy. OSS is not beggarware.
>
> I'm not sure I understand the point you are making :/
That the license states everything he needs to feel obliged to.
--
How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb?
You don't know, man. You don't KNOW.
Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991