Re: Who uses PHP
| From: | Eric Gorr | Date: | Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:19:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Who uses PHP | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-248156@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Feb 1, 2007, at 10:06 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
Eric Gorr wrote:Well, if you do not know the answer to my particular question, I'm curious how might you respond to someone who says:On Feb 1, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:ah right - please ignore my post - I wasn't really reading your question properly, my apologiesEric Gorr wrote:For their user authentication system? Session management? Everything? Don't suppose there would be any URL (press release, just general info, etc.) with that information?I've heard some concern expressed that PHP might be more insecure then other methods of developing website where security was of prime importance. Now, I personally do not believe this, but it would help me to convince others if I could point to major sites, where security (mostly with respect to the user authentication system) was extremely important (financial sites, etc.) and where PHP was the primary development platform.google, yahoo.for the rest search Zend.com or your favorite sdearch engineThanks. While zend.com, etc. will tell me who is using PHP, they do not generally state exactly how it is being used and, as much as the who, it is the how that is important.
PHP has to many security issues and should not be used with a user authentication system.
We should use XXX.
You are not allowed to say 'Well, you're wrong. PHP is as secure as anything else.' without explaining why.
Or, would you agree with the statement? Is there an 'XXX' that should be used instead of PHP?
Given the limited number of options for maintaining state information, I would be hard pressed to see how any language could be inherently more security or why one could not write PHP code which implemented the same techniques as 'XXX'.
(No, I do not know what 'XXX' might be.)