RE: [PHP] mysql_affected_rows inaccurate?
| From: | Peter Lauri | Date: | Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:41:12 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP] mysql_affected_rows inaccurate? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-248923@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Sometimes you can get fooled by the result. If nothing is changed on a
update the result for this function will give 0, because nothing was
affected. Although you might think so just because you are doing an
"update". However, an update doesn't necessary mean an update :)
Best regards,
Peter Lauri
www.dwsasia.com - company web site
www.lauri.se - personal web site
www.carbonfree.org.uk - become Carbon Free
-----Original Message-----
From: altendew [mailto:andrew@shiftcode.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 6:06 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] mysql_affected_rows inaccurate?
Hi a long time ago I stopped using mysql_affected_rows because I believed it
was giving me an inaccurate number. Now I was not very knowledged then so it
could of been my own fault. Is this function safe and functional? Could it
possibly give me the row result of a previous query I did and not the
latest?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/mysql_affected_rows-inaccurate--tf3234567.html#a898812
3
Sent from the PHP - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php