Re: Submitting as POST. Why?
| From: | Robert Cummings | Date: | Sat, 07 Apr 2007 01:11:45 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Submitting as POST. Why? | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-252180@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 20:44 -0400, Mike Shanley wrote:
> Chris,
>
> When you submit via GET, all the info shows up in the URL, so people can
> tamper with it however they like. Also, people can bookmark it as well.
Quite true.
> With POST, everything stays hidden, mostly untamperable, and
Bullshit. It is VERY easy to tamper with post data.
> unbookmarkable. POST might sound clearly better, but unless it's
> important that people don't change anything, then go with GET.
I go with POST almost exclusively when doing forms. I do so because my
form engine embeds various information (non-security sensitive
information) for the form. It works using get also, but it's ugly having
stuff like that in the URL. Additionally, for longer forms, there's a
limit to which browsers must adhere to acknowledge. I believe browsers
are only required to process 1024 bytes from a URL. Obviously some
browsers will process more, but now you're counting on a non-standard
feature. For the most part, if there's stuff in the URL parameters, then
they came from a link or a redirect.
Cheers,
Rob.
--
.------------------------------------------------------------.
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com
|
:------------------------------------------------------------:
| An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting |
| a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services |
| such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn |
| also provides an extremely flexible architecture for |
| creating re-usable components quickly and easily. |
`------------------------------------------------------------'